پارسی، ترجمه و ویرایش

نکاتی دربارۀ نگارش فارسی، تایپِ درست و ترجمه (اکبر خرّمی)

پارسی، ترجمه و ویرایش

نکاتی دربارۀ نگارش فارسی، تایپِ درست و ترجمه (اکبر خرّمی)

برخی از مطالب مهم این وبلاگ

برخی از مندرجات این وبلاگ دربارۀ نگارش درستِ فارسی، غلط‌های رایج تایپی، فونت‌های استاندارد و رفع مشکلات کیبورد فارسی:


(به دانشجویان گرامیِ رشتۀ مترجمی توصیه می‌شود حتماً مطالب همۀ لینک‌های زیر را مطالعه نمایند.)

دانلود ۵ دسته فونت فارسی منطبق با استاندارد یونیکد

تفاوت کاراکترهای فارسی با عربی

غلط‌های تایپی – ۱

آموزش مصوّر تصحیح کیبورد فارسی

نرم‌افزار رایگان چینش دلخواه کلیدهای کیبورد

مقایسۀ شکل «ـۀ» فارسی در چند فونت

مشکلات ما ایرانیــان در استفاده از فونت

نکات نگارشی و تایپی – ۲

انواع خط فاصله  (Em dash, En dash, Hyphen)

نیم‌فاصله یـا فاصلۀ مجازی (zwnj) در تایپ فارسی

جاسازیِ فونت‌ها در خودِ فایل ورد

 اطلاعات تماس با من در صفحۀ «دربارۀ من»

 

ترجمۀ سیاسی – متن ۲

ترجمۀ سیاسی – متن ۲

یکشنبه، ۲ اسفند ۹۴


مطالب زیر را نیز در همین وبلاگ مطالعه نمایید.

 

Terrorism


Though there is no generally agreed upon definition of “terrorism”, much can be said about what the term has denoted historically and what it has come to mean by the beginning of the twenty‑first century. Its significance for international relations and diplomacy in the contemporary world is beyond dispute. Events of the 1990s and early 2000s have shown terrorism to be one of the major problems confronting the global system in a period of deep and far-reaching transformation.


Terrorism is a form of political violence. It is, more specifically, violence directed against civilians for political purposes. Some authorities — including the United States government — define it as political violence against civilians committed by non-state actors. Others insist that political violence against civilians by states must also be considered a form of terrorism. In this case, the aerial bombardment of cities, most notably in World War II, may be seen as a form of state terrorism.


Historically, the use of “terrorism” dates back to the age of French Revolution. During the Reign of Terror (1793–1794), “terrorism” was employed in an attempt to eliminate “traitors” to the Revolution. The leaders of Reign of Terror thus saw “terrorism” as a way of defending the Revolution’s values of liberty, equality and brotherhood, but the term quickly became associated with the guillotine and state repression. Rather than an instrument for defending liberty, terrorism was the means by which the revolutionary government kept people subservient by keeping them in fear. Many of the most brutal regimes of the twentieth century employed terrorism in a similar manner, including Nazi German, the Soviet Union under Stalin, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, and Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

 

ترجمۀ سیاسی – متن ۱

ترجمۀ سیاسی – متن ۱

(یکشنبه، ۲۵ بهمن ۹۴)


انواع خط فاصله (Em dash, En dash, Hyphen)


Democracy as an international issue goes far beyond its direct connection to international peace. Where domestic peace has broken down, the international community must be able to assist in its restoration. In this work, democratic governance and the realization of human rights are essential. The United Nations (UN) not only can offer essential help in repairing democratic breakdowns in domestic peace but also must explore democratic principles at the global level.


Democratic Peace

Many associate connections between democracy and international peace with Immanuel Kant, whose essay of 1795, “Perpetual Peace,” argued that “republics” — which meant essentially what today we call liberal or pluralistic democracies — were less likely than other forms of state to go to war with one another. Broadly speaking, the last 200 years have proved him right. During that time there have been many horrible wars, which technology has made ever more destructive. Liberal democracies played a big part in those wars. But almost always they fought as allies. Dynastic states have fought each other throughout history — as have religious states, totalitarian states, and military dictatorships. But liberal democracies have generally found other ways to settle their disputes.


Democratic rulers cannot mobilize their countries for war without convincing most citizens that war is both just and necessary. This means convincing them that vital national interests or principles are involved and that there is no peaceful way to achieve the same objective.


By Annan, Kofi